Not a suitable candidate: is there a chance?
So, you have found the perfect job for yourself, but you are confused by one point in the requirements for the candidate, which makes you doubt whether you will be suitable for this position. Is it worth a try? How big are your chances? Will the employer consider an applicant that is only 80–90% eligible?
Work.ua identified the main and most common points on which such inconsistencies occur and analyzed them.
Experience
Almost always, employers clearly specify in the vacancy announcement the work experience necessary for the applicant. For example, you need an employee with work experience of three years or more. Is this framework so strict, and will a candidate with experience of one and a half year work for this position?
Alas, most often this is really critical. Indicating work experience, the employer expects a certain level of employee, which he will need to fulfill his duties. But there are always exceptions. If you are confident in your abilities, and over the past year and a half they have brought out a lot of valuable experience, then you should try. In this case, the name of your past company or companies plays a big role. Focus on the quality of this experience, correctly indicate your achievements.
The most critical lack of experience in highly specialized positions.
Education
An important role in choosing an employee is played by specialized education. But what if you are suitable in all respects, but your education is not economic, as indicated in the vacancy, but philological?
Skills and experience have more weight than specialized education. Therefore, in this case, of course, it is worth a try. Many employers know that having a specialized education does not always mean competency.
Software ownership
Often, work requires skills in a particular computer program. If you do not have such skills, you should determine how much deep knowledge is required by studying the responsibilities and specifics of the work. If there is no need for thorough and professional knowledge of a specific program, then you can convince the employer that you will master it as soon as possible.
Language question
In many companies, applicants are required to know at least one foreign language, often English. Should a specialist with an average knowledge of a foreign language try to get a job that requires a high level?
Typically, such requirements are indicated not just, but are necessary. If the vacancy refers to a high level of language proficiency, then this skill will be one of the main tools in the work.
So are there any chances?
Of course, first of all, employers will consider candidates who fully comply with the requirements. There are situations when the required specialists in the labor market are very few. If there are none, then the requirements will be relaxed. And you will have every chance to take a position. Of course, the employer will prefer the candidate whose training will take the least time.
If you meet most of the key requirements for the position and are confident in your abilities, then you can always try.
At the interview, do not embellish your skills and talk about non-existent knowledge. This can be easily verified right during the interview. It is best to focus on your knowledge and skills, not hiding what remains to be learned. If you are interested in this work and you really want to master all its nuances, then focus on this. Often, a candidate with high motivation wins over a more experienced one who is not very interested in work.
Work.ua identified the main and most common points on which such inconsistencies occur and analyzed them.
Experience
Almost always, employers clearly specify in the vacancy announcement the work experience necessary for the applicant. For example, you need an employee with work experience of three years or more. Is this framework so strict, and will a candidate with experience of one and a half year work for this position?
Alas, most often this is really critical. Indicating work experience, the employer expects a certain level of employee, which he will need to fulfill his duties. But there are always exceptions. If you are confident in your abilities, and over the past year and a half they have brought out a lot of valuable experience, then you should try. In this case, the name of your past company or companies plays a big role. Focus on the quality of this experience, correctly indicate your achievements.
The most critical lack of experience in highly specialized positions.
Education
An important role in choosing an employee is played by specialized education. But what if you are suitable in all respects, but your education is not economic, as indicated in the vacancy, but philological?
Skills and experience have more weight than specialized education. Therefore, in this case, of course, it is worth a try. Many employers know that having a specialized education does not always mean competency.
Software ownership
Often, work requires skills in a particular computer program. If you do not have such skills, you should determine how much deep knowledge is required by studying the responsibilities and specifics of the work. If there is no need for thorough and professional knowledge of a specific program, then you can convince the employer that you will master it as soon as possible.
Language question
In many companies, applicants are required to know at least one foreign language, often English. Should a specialist with an average knowledge of a foreign language try to get a job that requires a high level?
Typically, such requirements are indicated not just, but are necessary. If the vacancy refers to a high level of language proficiency, then this skill will be one of the main tools in the work.
So are there any chances?
Of course, first of all, employers will consider candidates who fully comply with the requirements. There are situations when the required specialists in the labor market are very few. If there are none, then the requirements will be relaxed. And you will have every chance to take a position. Of course, the employer will prefer the candidate whose training will take the least time.
If you meet most of the key requirements for the position and are confident in your abilities, then you can always try.
At the interview, do not embellish your skills and talk about non-existent knowledge. This can be easily verified right during the interview. It is best to focus on your knowledge and skills, not hiding what remains to be learned. If you are interested in this work and you really want to master all its nuances, then focus on this. Often, a candidate with high motivation wins over a more experienced one who is not very interested in work.
Comments
Post a Comment